Posted by : Reina in (Best For Your Baby, Best For Your Family)

Obama Voted against banning partial birth abortion

Tagged Under : ,

No Gravatar


Obama Voted against banning partial birth abortion

In 1997, Obama voted against SB 230, which would have turned doctors into felons by banning so-called partial-birth abortion, & against a 2000 bill banning state funding. Although these bills included an exception to save the life of the mother, they didn’t include anything about abortions necessary to protect the health of the mother. The legislation defined a fetus as a person, & could have criminalized virtually all abortion. Source: The Improbable Quest, by John K. Wilson, p.147-148 Oct 30, 2007
www.ontheissues.org/2008/Barack_Obama_Abortion.htm#1

Obama Trusts women to make own decisions on partial-birth abortion

Q: What us your view on the decision on partial-birth abortion and your reaction to most of the public agreeing with the court’s holding?

A: I think that most Americans recognize that this is a profoundly difficult issue for the women and families who make these decisions. They don’t make them casually. And I trust women to make these decisions in conjunction with their doctors and their families and their clergy. And I think that’s where most Americans are. Now, when you describe a specific procedure that accounts for less than 1% of the abortions that take place, then naturally, people get concerned, and I think legitimately so. But the broader issue here is: Do women have the right to make these profoundly difficult decisions? And I trust them to do it. There is a broader issue: Can we move past some of the debates around which we disagree and can we start talking about the things we do agree on? Reducing teen pregnancy; making it less likely for women to find themselves in these circumstances.

Source: 2007 South Carolina Democratic primary debate, on MSNBC Apr 26, 2007
www.ontheissues.org/2008/Barack_Obama_Abortion.htm#1

Obama Undecided on whether life begins at conception

Q: Do you personally believe that life begins at conception?
A: This is something that I have not come to a firm resolution on. I think it’s very hard to know what that means, when life begins. Is it when a cell separates? Is it when the soul stirs? So I don’t presume to know the answer to that question. What I know is that there is something extraordinarily powerful about potential life and that that has a moral weight to it that we take into consideration when we’re having these debates.

Source: 2008 Democratic Compassion Forum at Messiah College Apr 13, 2008
www.ontheissues.org/2008/Barack_Obama_Abortion.htm#1

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that anything that has the ability to grow is living; it’s alive, not dead or non existent. With that in mine, wouldn’t it be accurate to say that the unborn baby no matter how many weeks old he might be in the mother’s womb, he or she is alive and growing, and if we don’t interrupt the process it will continue to grow until it riches necessary maturity, and then it will be born, and it will continue to grow, and become a toddler, a child, a teen, an adult, a mother , or a father, a doctor, or a lawyer, a dentist,………. a member of society.

I was given that opportunity. You were given that opportunity. Had my mother decided to terminate her pregnancy when she was carrying me, I wouldn’t be here today, in which case I would have been murdered; because I was a person inside of my mother’s womb, in the most fragile and vulnerable stage of my life, but none the less, I was a person. The stage of life we are in does not change the fact that we are alive and have the right to continue to live.

When a pregnant woman decides to terminate her pregnancy, at whatever stage, that woman is terminating a life. I don’t care if it is only one week pregnant, two weeks, three, or four… Or whether one wants to call it a fetus to emotionally detach herself from it or be politically correct ……. The truth is that a living thing, a baby, another human being is growing inside that womb and it’s alive. And if it was alive and then is dead, and it didn’t happen due to natural causes, then it would be safe to say that someone killed it.

An unborn baby is a person in its most fragile and vulnerable stage, defenseless and at the mercy of those who conceived them. Anyone who performs, approves or supports the termination of the unborn child is nothing but a coward. Why don’t they try to mess with someone their own size? The atrocities being committed against the unborn babies, such as, the partial birth Abortion, all in the name of giving women choices, is inexcusable.

Women have plenty of choices. Let me tell you all the choices women have out there to prevent an unwanted pregnancy: there are condoms, plenty of contraceptive pills to choose from and contraceptive devices, and how about abstinence. It is not a secret that when one has sexual intercourse there is like a 99.9 percent chance of getting pregnant. So if a woman doesn’t want to get pregnant, why doesn’t she try one of the above mentioned choices? Is it such a big of an inconvenience to go to a store or pharmacy to purchase contraceptives? Women and teenage girls spend tons of money buying cosmetics, clothes, shoes, music cd’s, etc. If they know that they are going be having reckless sexual intercourse but don’t want to get pregnant, why don’t they behave more responsibly and invest in one of the preventive methods mentioned above, instead of foolishly getting pregnant and then wanting to terminate the pregnancy?

Some people may say what about the women who get pregnant due to rape? And what about the women who did used contraceptives but they failed and they don’t want a baby? Well, for that, there is a beautiful choice call adoption. And besides, let’s look at the statistics and see who are the people performing abortions. Of all the abortions being performed only 2% were due to rape, incest, physical life of mother, health of mother or fetal health. The other 98% of abortions were performed due to”personal choice”:
–too young/immature/not ready for responsibility
–economic
–to avoid adjusting life
–mother single or in poor relationship
–enough children already

REASONS FOR ABORTIONS IN THE US: COMPILED ESTIMATES Click bellow to see complete story http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/abreasons.html

rape

0.3 % (0.1-0.6 %)

incest

0.03 % (<0.1 %)

physical life of mother

0.2 % (0.1-0.3 %)

physical health of mother

1.0 % (0.1-3 %)

fetal health

0.5 % (0.1-1.0 %)

mental health of mother

depends on definition

“personal choice”
–too young/immature/not ready for responsibility
–economic
–to avoid adjusting life
–mother single or in poor relationship
–enough children already

98% (78-99 %)
–(32 %)
–25% (21-28 %)
–(16 %)
–(12-13 %)
–(4-8 %)

As you can see on the table above, 98% of abortions could have been prevented by responsibly using a contraceptive method. Instead these individuals recklessly enjoyed the pleasures of having sex and then don’t want to pay for the consequences of their irresponsible actions. That’s why abortions needs to banned altogether and Specially the Partial Birth Abortion.

Partial Birth Abortion

http://www.nrlc.org/ABORTION/pba/diagram.html

To see detailed images of partial-birth abortion, and documentation from medical experts on the accuracy of these images, click here.


partial-birth-abortion-step1

Guided by ultrasound, the abortionist grabs the baby’s leg with forceps.


partial-birth-abortion-step2

The baby’s leg is pulled out into the birth canal.


partial-birth-abortion-step3

The abortionist delivers the baby’s entire body, except for the head.


partial-birth-abortion-step4

The abortionist jams scissors into the baby’s skull. The scissors are then opened to enlarge the hole.


partial-birth-abortion-step5

The scissors are removed and a suction catheter is inserted. The child’s brains are sucked out, causing the skull to collapse. The dead baby is then removed.

To see detailed images of partial-birth abortion, and documentation from medical experts on the accuracy of these images, click here.

This friends is nothing but a slaughter and it should be stopped immediately and punished to the maximum extend of the law. And anyone who performs, approves or supports these massacres is nothing but a cold-blooded murderer.  And this is why I’m not looking forward to Obama’s presidential inaguration.

Posted by : Reina in (Best For Your Family, Best For Your Kids)

Child-rape Death Penalty

Tagged Under :

No Gravatar

I was reading that a couple of months ago the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the child-rape death penalty in Louisiana. The case that overturned the law was that of Patrick Kennedy. The 43-year-old was sentenced to death for the rape of his 8-year-old stepdaughter. He is one of two people in the U.S., both in Louisiana, condemned to death for a rape not accompanied by a killing.

The Louisiana Foundation Against Sexual Assault, a victim-advocacy group, shared the concern voiced by the court that the death penalty in such cases could endanger rather than protect children. They uphold that “making the punishment for child rape and murder equivalent, a state that punishes child rape by death may remove a strong incentive for the rapist not to kill the victim.”

The court said Louisiana law allowing the death penalty to be imposed in such cases violates the Constitution’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment, and that “The death penalty is not a proportional punishment for the rape of a child.”

Forty-five states ban the death penalty for any kind of rape, and the other five states allow it for child rapists. Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Texas allow executions in such cases if the defendant had previously been convicted of raping a child.

I am 100% pro-life, and an opponent of the death penalty, but I always thought that having enforced the death penalty for child rape would discourage individuals from committing this type of crimes. That knowing the consequence of their actions would be death row would scare them away from even trying to commit these hideous crimes against children. So hearing the court’s opinion that imposing the death penalty on a child rapist will actually encourage them to kill the victim was something I never pondered.

Maybe the U.S. Supreme Court is right or maybe they are not. Which is best to help keep our children safe from sexual predators? To allow the death penalty for child rapists or not to allow it? and what punishment is proportional to the rape of a child? Just let the parents of the victim answer that one.

God forbids, this happens to your family, what kind of punishment would you like be enforced on the perpetrator?

Want to know how many registered sex offenders live near you? In your neighborhood, Children schools, Parks, and within a 20 to 30 miles ratios? On this Website, go to Helpful Resources on the far right, and click on SEXUAL PREDATOR SEARCH.

Posted by : Reina in (Best For Your Baby, Best For Your Family)

Alarms aim to save children left in cars

Tagged Under :

No Gravatar

I came across the following article on a new technology being developed aimed to aid parents remember a child left in a car, although written in 2004, I find this report very interesting and relevant today since the hyperthermia-deaths-of-children-in-hot-vehicles continue to happen.

However, we are already nearing the end of 2008, four years after this report was written, and I have not heard of anything of this nature already in place. Does anyone know anything about this new technology out there? If you do, would you be so kind to share with us by placing a comment on this post?

 

ARTICLE:
Alarms aim to save children left in cars

By Robert Nolin
Staff Writer
October 8, 2004

Even the best parents can sometimes lose track of their kids. But when they forget a young child in a closed car, as police said one Hollywood

man did last week, the consequences can quickly turn deadly.
At the urging of consumer and child safety groups, devices designed to alert a parent to a child left in a car are coming closer to reality.
“There just needs to be a fail-safe system,” said Janette Fennell, founder and president of the Leawood, Kan.-based organization Kids and Cars.
Fennell, who tracks fatalities resulting from children left in hot cars, said the figures support the need for special alarms. Last year, 42 children nationwide, most 3 or younger, died from heat exposure after being left in a closed vehicle. The number stands at 34 so far this year, including nine in Florida

.
South Florida has already seen four such cases, the most recent on Oct. 1. Hollywood police said Thomas C. Wade Jr., 20, drove his sisters to school with the 1-year-old son of his girlfriend in the back seat. He returned to the Polk Street

home he shared with his girlfriend, Danielle Peterson, 19, and left Trent Peterson in the car.
Several hours later, police said, Wade remembered Trent, snatched him from the car and dashed inside. An autopsy revealed Trent

died from heat exposure. Wade was charged with manslaughter.
Manslaughter charges were also leveled in the three other South Florida cases: That of Antonio Balta of Elmont, N.Y., whose 9-month-old daughter Veronika died in her car seat in March while Balta was at the horse track; Melissa Wildman of Lake Worth, whose 4-month-old daughter Savanna was forgotten and died in a car in April after Wildman spent a night drinking and taking drugs; and dentist Dennis Francisco Sierra, whose 3-year-old son Andres died in a car outside his father’s Boca Raton office in July.
Had alarm devices been available, those and other deaths across the country may have been avoided, said Sally Greenberg, senior product safety counsel with Consumers Union in Washington, D.C.

“I would like nothing more than to see technology come to the market that would help remind otherwise conscientious parents that they have a child in the car,” Greenberg said.
A case of a child’s death in a car last year in Dallas

spurred Michael Sheriff of AirGATE Technologies to develop a device that attaches to a child’s car seat buckle. When the car’s ignition is turned off, an alarm sounds in about 20 seconds if the child’s seat strap is still buckled.
Fennell said NASA is developing a device that is placed under the pad of a child’s car seat. The pad registers the weight of the child and a receiver on the driver’s key ring would sound if taken more then 15 feet from the car while a child is still in the seat.
Eron Shosteck, spokesman for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, said, “No technology is ever going to be a substitute for vigilant parenting.”
Robert Nolin can be reached at rnolin@sun-sentinel.com or 954-572-2024.
 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2004, South Florida Sun-Sentinel

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/palmbeach/sfl-psstifle08oct08,0,4398213.story?coll=sfla-news-palm

Posted by : Reina in (Best For Your Family)

BusinessWeek’s – Best Places to Raise Your Kids, 2007

Tagged Under :

No Gravatar

Would you move thousands and thousands of miles away from friends and relatives to give your family a piece of mind and a better future? To a place where schools are the best in the nation, where crime rates and cost of living are low, and children have a safer environment to grow up in?

My family and I made such a move about a year ago. We left the busy streets of the city, for the quite and narrow streets of the suburbs in another state, a state that we had never been to before and had no friends or relatives in. A bit risky, you might think, but very well worth it. We have no regrets. Life is so much better where we are now.

If you are considering or have ever considered doing such a thing, here is a helpful list published by Business Week that can make your search for such a place much easier. To access the complete story click on this link: http://images.businessweek.com/ss/07/11/1116_bestplaces_kids/index_01.htm

No. 50 - Patterson, Ga.
Nearest city: Savannah (92 miles)
Population: 627
Median household income: $26,591

No. 49 - Galesburg, Mich.
Nearest city: Grand Rapids (67 miles)
Population: 1,988
Median household income: $34,663

No. 48 - Chagrin Falls, Ohio
Nearest city: Cleveland (24 miles)
Population: 4,024
Median household income: $62,917

No. 47 - South Cleveland, Tenn.
Nearest city: Chattanooga (30 miles)
Population: 6,216
Median household income: $35,995

No. 46 - St. Johnsville, N.Y.
Nearest city: Rochester (167 miles)
Population:
1,685
Median household income: $28,043

No. 45 - Mariemont, Ohio
Nearest city: Cincinnati (7 miles)
Population: 3,408
Median household income: $57,614

No. 44 - Davenport, Neb.
Nearest city: Lincoln (99 miles)
Population: 339
Median household income: $26,964

No. 43 - Oakland, N.J.
Nearest city: Newark (36 miles)
Population: 12,466
Median household income: $86,629

No. 42 - Haslett, Mich.
Nearest city: Lansing (9 miles)
Population: 11,283
Median household income: $50,679

No. 41 - Arlington, Neb.
Nearest city: Omaha (50 miles)
Population: 1,197
Median household income: $45,365

No. 40 - Madeira, Ohio
Nearest city: Cincinnati (7 miles)
Population: 8,923Median household income: $59,626

No. 39 - Loomis, Neb.
Nearest city: Lincoln (167 miles)
Population: 397
Median household income: $36,719

No. 38 - Oakland, Neb.
Nearest city: Omaha (67 miles)
Population: 1,367
Median household income: $32,663

No. 37 - Diller, Neb.
Nearest city: Lincoln (62 miles)
Population: 287
Median household income: $37,813

No. 36 - Newcastle, Neb.
Nearest city: Omaha (125 miles)
Population: 299
Median household income: $29,000

No. 35 - Franklin, Ga.
Nearest city: Atlanta (65 miles)
Population: 902
Median household income: $19,125

No. 34 - Clarence Center, N.Y.
Nearest city: Buffalo (20 miles)
Population: 1,747
Median household income: $66,311

No. 33 - Clarendon Hills, Ill.
Nearest city: Chicago (22 miles)
Population: 7,610
Median household income: $84,795

No. 32 - Petersburg, Neb.
Nearest city: Lincoln (131 miles)
Population: 374
Median household income: $29,688

No. 31 - Friendship, N.Y.
Nearest city: Buffalo (101 miles)
Population: 1,176
Median household income: $25,524

No. 30 - Buffalo Grove, Ill.
Nearest city: Chicago (32 miles)
Population: 42,909
Median household income: $80,525

No. 29 - Nolanville, Tex.
Nearest city: Austin (68 miles)
Population: 2,150
Median household income: $36,140

No. 28 - Lyndhurst, Ohio
Nearest city: Cleveland (11 miles)
Population: 15,279
Median household income: $52,272

No. 27 - Fairmount, N.Y.
Nearest city: Syracuse (5
miles)
Population: 10,795
Median household income: $48,329

No. 26 - Dundee, Ore.
Nearest city: Portland (26 miles)
Population: 2,598
Median household income: $50,284

No. 25 - Barrington, Ill.
Nearest city: Chicago (38 miles)
Population: 10,168
Median household income: $83,085

No. 24 - Sherman, N.Y.
Nearest city: Buffalo (88 miles)
Population: 714
Median household income: $30,583

No. 23 - Douglas, Mich.
Nearest city: Grand Rapids (43 miles)
Population: 1,214
Median household income: $41,250

No. 22 - Bartlett, Neb.
Nearest city: Lincoln (169 miles)
Population: 128
Median household income: $33,250

No. 21 - Batavia, Ill.
Nearest city: Chicago (44 miles)
Population: 23,866
Median household income: $68,656

No. 20 - Ackerman, Miss.
Nearest city: Birmingham, Ala. (160 miles)
Population:1,696
Median household income: $21,287

No. 19 - Fort Thomas, Ky.
Nearest city: Cincinnati (6 miles)
Population: 16,495
Median household income: $49,575

No. 18 - Jamestown, Ky.
Nearest city: Lexington (88 miles)
Population: 1,624Median household income: $18,587
No. 17 - Lawrence, Neb.
Nearest city: Lincoln (136 miles)
Population: 312
Median household income: $25,089

No. 16 - Green, Ohio
Nearest city: Akron (11 miles)
Population: 22,817
Median household income: $54,133

No. 15 - East Brainerd, Tenn.
Nearest city: Chattanooga (13 miles)
Population: 14,132
Median household income: $66,151

No. 14 - Ridgetop, Tenn.
Nearest city: Nashville (20 miles)
Population: 1,083
Median household income: $52,381

No. 13 - Helena, Ala.
Nearest city: Birmingham (20 miles)
Population: 10,296
Median household income: $62,908

No. 12 - Matawan, N.J.
Nearest city: Edison (16 miles)
Population: 8,910
Median household income: $63,594

No. 11 - Middleport, N.Y.
Nearest city: Buffalo (40 miles)
Population: 1,917
Median household income: $36,464

No. 10 - Hopewell, Tenn.
Nearest city: Nashville (104 miles)
Population: 1,815
Median household income: $43,973

No. 9 - Waterville, Ohio
Nearest city: Toledo (15 miles)
Population: 4,828
Median household income: $60,000

No. 8 - Lackland, Tex.
Nearest city: San Antonio (12 miles)
Population: 7,123
Median household income: $32,250

No. 7 - Wilmette, Ill.
Nearest city: Chicago (20 miles)
Population: 27,651
Median household income: $106,773

No. 6 - Waverly, Neb.
Nearest city: Lincoln (15 miles)
Population: 2,448
Median household income: $52,454

No. 5 - Arapahoe, Neb.
Nearest city: Lincoln (192 miles)
Population: 1,028
Median household income: $29,500

No. 4 - Echelon, N.J.
Nearest city: Philadelphia (17 miles)
Population: 10,440
Median household income: $49,410

No. 3 - Deerfield, Ill.
Nearest city: Chicago (27 miles)
Population: 18,420
Median household income: $107,194

No. 2 - Western Springs, Ill.
Nearest city: Chicago (21 miles)
Population: 12,493
Median household income: $98,876

No. 1 - Groesbeck, Ohio
Nearest city: Cincinnati (7 miles)
Population: 7,202
Median household income: $49,235